Do you ever hear words coming out of your mouth, and think to yourself “Damn…. How batshit crazy am I??”
The last time this happened to me was in my meeting with the PR department. We were meeting to discuss the programming for the autumn and I said, “what if I did two lectures, one on the Black Lives Matter movement and one on the Me Too movement?”
The thought process was solid. I have personal, professional, and academic experience with both. I can talk about them both. They are related. What could go wrong…
… with discussing two of the most controversial and explosive topics in modern society, outside their original cultural context, in my third language?
I clearly wasn’t firing on all cylinders in that meeting. But because I am charming with my wit and sense of humor (the big American smile doesn’t hurt either), my programs were approved.
My personal reaction:
I dove into researching, and dusted off the cobwebs from my memories:
Sitting at my computer, reading that Trayvon Martin’s murderer was acquitted when all the boy had done was walk down the street wearing a hoodie and carrying a bag of Skittles.
The stranger who grabbed my crotch when we passed each other on a sidewalk.
Having my entire university campus shocked when a young woman was gang-raped by a group of basketball players (who lived in the same university housing building as I did) and the players were allowed to finish the semester and play in the following season, while keeping their athletic scholarships. She had to drop out of school because of the trauma.
Seeing the SWAT team coming down from Ferguson Missouri to downtown St. Louis as the early Black Lives Matter protests escalated. Hearing the sound of breaking windows rising on the night air with plumes of smoke from flash bombs and screams of fear and anger, sirens and police lights zipping back and forth on my street.
Reading the news reports about the young, unarmed black man who was murdered by police four blocks from my apartment a mere 30 minutes after I had run past that very alley.
After getting hit in the legs with a willow switch by my male boss, my screamed “NO!” ignored, my husband demanded that my boss apologize to me. What my boss said was “I’m sorry you reacted how you did, but these are just our traditions, and if you don’t like it and can’t accept it, you should go back to where you came from.”
Brain physiology is something that has helped me immensely in processing the headshaking “is this really happening right now?” moments in my life. The three main parts involved in processing events are the amygdala (controls the freeze, fight or flight response), the hippocampus (processes and stores memories), and the frontal lobe (controls emotions, reason, abstract thinking, etc.). So after reviewing my memories, the amygdala and the hippocampus having a great catchup time, I dove into research to give power back to the frontal lobe.
Rational discussion:
When discussing the Me Too and Black Lives Matter movements, I think a lot of the conflict stems from a disagreement in terms (lifehack: this is the case for most disagreements and misunderstandings). Even as we try to participate in conversations, people tend to equivocate some very loaded terms. I have included a couple of them here with some general definitions.
- Fault: an action that someone carries out, or directly causes to be carried out (I didn’t step on the brake, therefore the car accident is my fault).
- Responsibility: someone caused something else to happen, be that an action or circumstances (I didn’t screw the lid onto the milk tightly enough, so the spilled milk is my responsibility).
- Vice: an intentional action or activity that causes harm to the main participant and/or a third party (overuse of alcohol is a vice).
- Foolishness: an action, activity, or belief that goes against logic and leads to undesirable outcomes (pulling the tail of an aggressive dog is an example of foolishness).
These terms overlap somewhat, and it can be difficult to determine where to place blame.
Let’s take a neutral example to begin. Cookies are sitting on the table and a child takes some when his mother, who has put them on the table, is not looking. We may say that the vice is stealing the cookie when the household rules state otherwise (notable: in order for the rules to be just, this counts as a vice only if the rules against taking cookies are clear to the child).
Given that the child did the stealing, it is the child’s fault.
In stealing the cookie, the child and the mother both have responsibility: the mother for putting the cookies in a place where they could be stolen, the child for taking the cookies.
The child has both responsibility and fault. Given that he did, in fact, steal the cookies, he may very well have stolen the cookies even if the mother hid them. Depending on how well the mother knows her child, it may have been foolishness on her part to put them in easy reach. But no matter where she put the cookies, it is wrong to steal cookies. No matter how natural it is to steal the cookies, given how delicious they are and how much the child loves them and wants them, it is wrong to steal cookies.
The child, as the primary actor in the stealing, has the fault.
It is not the mother’s fault.
The fine line between responsibility and fault comes into play especially in cases of alleged harassment, assault, or misconduct. Especially when all those words like vice, sin, responsibility are so loaded with personal and societal connotations. Especially when there are multiple active participants and multiple vices and multiple levels of responsibility. When discussing movements like Me Too or Black Lives Matter, it is even more intimidating. But I am going to give it a try in our two upcoming events this fall at the library.
Things to remember:
Human beings are not good at empathizing. We are good at sizing up a situation from afar and evaluating it quickly, usually on the basis of how much we can relate to it – would I do it that way? How might I do it differently? This is natural, we are pack animals with a few natural predators (though nothing poses a greater risk to us than our own stupidity). Our ancestors needed to be able to react immediately and evaluate risk quickly.
But that was centuries ago. The amygdala and hippocampus got much more of a workout back then. In the 21st century, evaluating the actions of others, we must remember that we are not in that situation we are observing, and we do not have the lived experience of the other person in that situation. Of course we would not react like they do. But we cannot say for certain that we would not react the same were we in their shoes.
Resist fearing the threat of the unfamiliar. Approach that which is different with curiosity and a willingness to listen. Be kind to others, and to yourself. You are at once perfectly unique and perfectly the same as everyone else. Look at those around you with this lens, and treat them with this same respect.